Rhetorical Analysis of the Reformist Jane Adams Research Paper

Rhetorical Analysis of the Reformist Jane Adams - Research Paper Example In 1912, Addams was also among the lead supporters of Theodore Roosevelt on the Bull Moose (Progressive) party ticket; she also co-founded the Woman’s International League for Peace and Freedom which was a key facilitator of her winning the Nobel Peace Prize in 1931. Cedarville Illinois was the birthplace of Jane, she had eight siblings and was the second-last born of the family; their father was a successful political leader (local), serving sixteen years in the Senate, fought as an officer in the Civil War and was a close friend of Abraham Lincoln; they used to call each other ‘My Dear Double’. Jane had an inherited spinal blemish that contributed to her physical instability throughout her life though it was often remedied by surgery. Jane graduated from the Rockford Female Seminary class of Seventeen in 1881, be given a bachelor’s degrees the following year after the school was accredited to Rockford College for Women; later on, she started studying medicine her health condition interfered as she was being hospitalized now and then. Jane traveled to Europe where she continued with her studies for slightly less than two years after which she spent two more years writing and reading as she laid her objectives for the future; while there Jane and her friend Ellen Starr took a visit to Toynbee Hall, a settlement house in London’s East End which assisted greatly influenced a similar idea she had of starting a similar place for the underprivileged in Chicago. Jane is known to have come up with a variety of quotes with the most common being ‘Action indeed is the sole medium of expression for ethics’; others include; ‘Nothing could be worse than the fear that one had given up too soon and left one unexpended effort that might have saved the world’.

Sam 489 unit 10 Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Sam 489 unit 10 - Assignment Example ies and NGOs offer funding and programming in recovery and this should be properly harmonized to facilitate its effectiveness (Haddow, Bullock & Coppola, 2011). The advantage of giving equal weight, in terms of resources, to all phases of emergency is that it eliminates delays and dependence on the Federal government for funding. This is because the state organs can respond to any disasters at anytime without complaining for lack of resources. It is also apparent that supporting all phases with equal weight of resources will increase preparedness. For instance, the post-terrorist attacks and hurricane disasters have enabled state departments to allocate resources to emergency teams (Haddow, Bullock & Coppola, 2011). Such initiatives have also been instrumental in helping the survivors of the disasters, such as Hurricane Sandy victims. This enables the managers to design long-term recovery efforts that seek to attend to different situations. The availability of resources to the emergency management teams promotes education of the communities on ways of addressing disasters in their neighborhoods (Rubin, 2012). In this regard, it is essential to provide all phases of emergency management with equal weight of resources since it reduces confusion and